Opera East at Magdalene College, Cambridge, February 16
|
Within four years of its première at the Little Theatre, Haymarket in August 1787, Colman’s and Arnold’s Inkle and Yarico had been produced as far afield as New York, Philadelphia, Jamaica and Calcutta; in London it would hold the stage for half a century. Yet if it is still remembered at all today, it is only for its status as the first ‘anti-slavery opera’. Hence the appearance of this highly entertaining revival, staged at the conclusion of a day-long conference to commemorate the 200th anniversary of the abolition of the slave trade. Is the work of more than historical interest? The music is certainly unflaggingly tuneful, but is rarely the main focus, serving predominantly to break up the action. The drama meanwhile, though advertised here as semi-staged (with scenery provided by projected images) was fully and funnily acted, mixing strong debate with engagingly witty banter. And the inclusion of some more extended musical pieces – such as the Guyanan princess Yarico’s meditation on nature, ‘Sweet bird’ (long a successful piece in its own right and finely sung on this occasion by Joana Thomé) – provided some room for vocal display. Despite (or perhaps because of) the work’s erstwhile popularity, no surviving edition of it includes all the various musical numbers, or corresponds precisely to a single production. So for the purposes of this revival, Richard Luckett pieced together all the surviving material before cutting it down to a playable version, dispensing with surplus characters and dialogue, and reducing the three-act original to a more compact two. |
The result was occasionally patchwork in character, but in a way that fitted in entirely with the pasticcio norm of the time, lending a credibly late-eighteenth century aura to the performance; this was only strengthened by the contribution of the audience, whether offering audible disapproval of any pro-slavery speeches or spontaneous applause after Andrew Wicken’s virtuosically hammy rendition of Sir Christopher Curry’s grand excoriation of the merchant Thomas Inkle. Benjamin Walton |
Opera East at Iford Festival, June 29
|
Gauging the operas that will work in Iford’s miniscule space is an art in itself. In this instance, the natural affinity between the Italianate setting and Stravinsky’s neo-Classical score was apparent; moreover, the clarity with which the vocal and instrumental lines were defined was often revelatory. The conductor Oliver Gooch certainly revealed himself as a Stravinsky interpreter of real insight. Yet it was Clarke’s reflection of the Jungian slant of Auden’s libretto (written with Chester Kallman) that brought such a strong psychological truth to this production. Instead of a Shadow whose presence is satanic and physically overbearing, Daniel Grice matched Peter Wilman’s Tom in height and build; by their being dressed identically, the idea of an internal demon was forcefully suggested. |
Grice proved himself to be a singer of considerable stature, implying the insinuating charms of Nick as well as his darkly sinister power most convincingly. Wilman may not have been in the same league as Grice in what is anyway a hugely taxing role, but he touchingly conveyed Tom’s gullibility and, even as his money disappeared, sympathy accrued steadily thanks to the deeply genuine expressions of his love for Anne. By the time it was translated into Adonis’s love for Venus, it was heart-rending. Revecca van den Berg’s Anne Truelove was impressive; always in control and movingly sung. Louise Crane’s Mother Goose was strong, carrying the pantomime flamboyance of the character while also suggesting that this tart still has a beating heart. Deborah Hawksley’s Baba was extremely gutsy too and, since Iford operates with a skeleton staff, the fervour with which Crane and Hawkesley threw themselves into the multitude of other roles with the ensemble only added to the enjoyment of the evening. Rian Evans
|